I haven't written a solid knitting-related post in a while, mostly because I've been caught up doing other stuff. I *have* been knitting though.
Remember this sweater?
Well, I started my version.
It's going to be much more structured than the green one--looking at that saggy lower edge just makes me sad. I cast on provisionally at the top so I can add either a small standing collar or a simple hem facing later. The pattern is simple: reverse stockinette and columns of twisted knit stitches that are slipped on the wrong side. I'm knitting what's essentially a huge circle with an opening down the front. Once I get to elbow length (about 14" on me), I'll take an enormous number of stitches off for the sleeves and continue with a fitted body. I have grand plans for some contrasting hem facings in the sleeves, possibly cobalt blue. And then patterned black and cobalt blue elbow-length (fingerless?) gloves to wear with it.
All increases are done within the reverse stockinette areas. I had to rip out a few times because I couldn't get the increase rate right, but once I pulled out my Barbara Walker and read up on round yoke increases, it's been smooth sailing. Since there are 31 ribs of reverse stockinette and I didn't want to increase more than two stitches per rib per increase round, I was limited to increasing 62 stitches at a time. What I remember of knitting round yokes in the past was something about doubling the number of stitches when you double the length (i.e., double the stitches after an inch, then after two, then four, etc.). Since I wanted to keep the number of stitches I was increasing at a time static, that wasn't going to work for me. The venerable Ms. Walker wrote that you just need to increase four stitches per round, so however many plain rounds you want to do between increases, you multiply by four and increase that number of stitches.
Alternately, you can work backwards: say you know you want to increase 62 stitches every time and need to find out how many rows to knit plain between increases in order to make a pleasingly proportioned jacket, you would divide 62 increase stitches by 4 stitches per round (~16 rounds). I'm increasing every 12 rows instead, because in order to achieve the exaggerated, flared silhouette I want, I need to cram more increase rounds into 14" than a 16-row repeat would give me.
We'll see how that all shakes out. I feel good about it though. Assuming it works out, I'll write the pattern up and put it up on the site. I think it could be a one-size-fits-all jobber. If you need a bigger body, you just take fewer stitches off for the sleeves.
In wacky research news, I spent yesterday afternoon in the library at the New-York Historical Society going through classified business directories from the 1890s. I may have made a breakthrough in terms of what I'm actually being paid to look for, but my delight in that paled in comparison to my delight in finding this entry: "Bruised Eyes Cured, Thomas Kean 1352 B'way." How did he cure them? Did people really look in what was essentially the Yellow Pages under "bruised" when they had a black eye? Today, I'm heading out to the New York County Clerk's office to look for records of corporations and partnerships that include the names I found yesterday.
[Edited to add: The difference between the last few days of dealing with extremely pleasant people who are used to helping researchers and today's trip into the bowels of the city offices is astounding. I learned why civil servants have such a bad reputation (lazy, rude, etc.): because they deserve it. It was not a fun afternoon.]
And for Claudia, who requested a better picture of the phone, your wish is my command (it's this one):